Socciological Reasearch Proposal- Violence and gun control Term Paper

Socciological Reasearch Proposal- Violence and gun control - Term Paper Exampleops as armed forces and the importance of maintaining our firepower has been set throughout the human history, which the firearm has helped to shape. The father of the nation have identified the necessity of arming the citizen to protect themselves and made it a part of the constitution for them to have arms However, comparing to some other countries United States have more fatalities due to fire arm violence.It is widely observed that the United States has basically higher rate of gun violence because its gun control measures are not as rigid as those found in Great Britain, Australia and Japan. The rate of gun link homicides in United States is more along with other fatalities involving gun. President Bill Clinton initiated a $15 million program directed at lowering the anatomy of guns in and around housing projects. When the people bring guns to local police stations they received fifty dollars on each weapon these were then undone (Squires 2001)Gun violence is an issue of major concern in America. US have a high gun murder rate as compared to England and other countries where Gun control rules are stricter. Gun control has been a controversial issue for years. A vast majority of citizens believe that, if gun control is rigorously enforced it would quickly reduce the threat of crime. According to(La Follette 2001) Based upon the production data from manufacturers of fire arms there around 300 million firearms owned by citizens in the United States as of 2010. Among them, about 100 million are handguns. This shows the rate of guns owned by the citizens and risk of violence prevalent in the country. He suggests that 16,272 murders occurred in the United States in the year of 2008. About 10,886 or 67% were performed with firearms.It is very important to ensure the safety of the public by implementing a gun control system. If the children find gun at home they can use by not k nowing the consequences of it. A much planned impartiality and